Capacitive detection of fold angle for foldable devices

ABSTRACT

A system for determining a fold angle and an open or closed state of a foldable device includes: a plurality of electrodes, including a first set of electrodes for performing absolute capacitance sensing and a second set of electrodes for performing transcapacitance sensing, wherein each of the second set of electrodes is farther from a fold line of the foldable device than each of the first set of electrodes; and a processing system, configured to: obtain absolute capacitance measurements via the first set of electrodes; obtain at least one transcapacitance measurement via at least one receiver electrode of the second set of electrodes; determine the fold angle of the foldable device based on the absolute capacitance measurements; and determine whether the foldable device is in an open state or a closed state based on the at least one transcapacitance measurement.

CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS

This patent application is a continuation-in-part of copending U.S. patent application Ser. No. 17/861,022, filed Jul. 8, 2022, which is incorporated by reference herein in its entirety.

BACKGROUND

Input devices such as touch sensor devices (also commonly called touchpads or proximity sensor devices), are widely used in a variety of electronic systems. Touch sensor devices typically include a sensing region, often demarked by a surface, in which the touch sensor device determines the presence, location and/or motion of one or more input objects, typically for purposes allowing a user to provide user input to interact with the electronic system. Another type of input device may be a touchscreen that includes a plurality of electrodes and is also capable of allowing the user to provide user input to interact with the electronic system.

In recent years, foldable devices having touchscreens or other types of capacitive sensors have been developed. However, conventional foldable devices do not utilize their capacitive sensor(s) to detect a fold angle of the foldable device because of issues such as temperature sensitivity, errors attributable to changes in display image, and heavy filtering being needed. Rather, to detect a fold angle, conventional foldable devices use a dedicated set of gyroscopic sensors and/or accelerometers. Additionally, for detecting closure of the foldable device, conventional foldable devices use a dedicated IR sensor or Hall sensor.

SUMMARY

In an exemplary embodiment, the present disclosure provides a system for determining a fold angle of a foldable device includes a plurality of electrodes and a processing system. The plurality of electrodes includes at least one first electrode and at least one second electrode, wherein the at least one second electrode is farther from a fold line of the foldable device than the at least one first electrode. The processing system is configured to: obtain at least one first absolute capacitance measurement via the at least one first electrode and at least one second absolute capacitance measurement via the at least one second electrode; and determine a fold angle of the foldable device based on the at least one first absolute capacitance measurement and the at least one second absolute capacitance measurement.

In a further exemplary embodiment, dimensions of the at least one first electrode are changed by folding of the foldable device and dimensions of the at least one second electrode are unchanged by folding of the foldable device.

In a further exemplary embodiment, dimensions of the at least one second electrode are changed to a lesser extent by folding of the foldable device relative to the at least one first electrode.

In a further exemplary embodiment, the at least one first electrode comprises a first electrode on a first side of the fold line of the foldable device and a first electrode on a second side of the fold line of the foldable device; the at least one second electrode comprises a second electrode on the first side of the fold line of the foldable device and a second electrode on the second side of the fold line of the foldable device; and obtaining the at least one first absolute capacitance measurement via the at least one first electrode and the at least one second absolute capacitance measurement via the at least one second electrode comprises obtaining absolute capacitance measurements from each of the first electrode on the first side of the fold line of the foldable device, the first electrode on the second side of the fold line of the foldable device, the second electrode on the first side of the fold line of the foldable device, and the second electrode on the second side of the fold line of the foldable device.

In a further exemplary embodiment, the processing system is further configured to: while obtaining the at least one first absolute capacitance measurement via the at least one first electrode and the at least one second absolute capacitance measurement via the at least one second electrode, guard and ground other electrodes of the plurality of electrodes.

In a further exemplary embodiment, guarding and grounding the other electrodes of the plurality of electrodes includes guarding an electrode adjacent to the at least one second electrode.

In a further exemplary embodiment, determining the fold angle of the foldable device comprises: utilizing the at least one second absolute capacitance measurement to cancel out interference effects common to the at least one first electrode and the at least one second electrode.

In a further exemplary embodiment, utilizing the at least one second absolute capacitance measurement to cancel out interference effects common to the at least one first electrode and the at least one second electrode comprises subtracting the at least one second absolute capacitance measurement from the at least one first absolute capacitance measurement.

In a further exemplary embodiment, determining the fold angle of the foldable device is further based on reference baseline measurements taken at a known fold angle.

In a further exemplary embodiment, determining the fold angle of the foldable device comprises comparing the at least one first and at least one second absolute capacitance measurements to the reference baseline measurements.

In a further exemplary embodiment, the at least one first electrode comprises a first electrode disposed at the fold line of the foldable device; the at least one second electrode comprises a second electrode on the first side of the fold line of the foldable device and a second electrode on the second side of the fold line of the foldable device; and obtaining the at least one first absolute capacitance measurement via the at least one first electrode and obtaining the at least one second absolute capacitance measurement via the at least one second electrode comprises obtaining absolute capacitance measurements from each of the first electrode disposed at the fold line of the foldable device, the second electrode on the first side of the fold line of the foldable device, and the second electrode on the second side of the fold line of the foldable device.

In another exemplary embodiment, the present disclosure provides a method for determining a fold angle of a foldable device. The method includes: obtaining, by a processing system, at least one first absolute capacitance measurement via at least one first electrode of a plurality of electrodes and at least one second absolute capacitance measurement via at least one second electrode of the plurality of electrodes, wherein the at least one second electrode is farther from a fold line of the foldable device than the at least one first electrode; and determining, by the processing system, a fold angle of the foldable device based on the at least one first absolute capacitance measurement and the at least one second absolute capacitance measurement.

In yet another exemplary embodiment, the present disclosure provides a non-transitory computer-readable medium having processor-executable instructions stored thereon for determining a fold angle of a foldable device. The processor-executable instructions, when executed, facilitate: obtaining, by a processing system, at least one first absolute capacitance measurement via at least one first electrode of a plurality of electrodes and at least one second absolute capacitance measurement via at least one second electrode of the plurality of electrodes, wherein the at least one second electrode is farther from a fold line of the foldable device than the at least one first electrode; and determining, by the processing system, a fold angle of the foldable device based on the at least one first absolute capacitance measurement and the at least one second absolute capacitance measurement.

In yet another exemplary embodiment, the present disclosure provides a system for determining a fold angle and an open or closed state of a foldable device. The system includes: a plurality of electrodes, including a first set of electrodes for performing absolute capacitance sensing and a second set of electrodes for performing transcapacitance sensing, wherein each of the second set of electrodes is farther from a fold line of the foldable device than each of the first set of electrodes; and a processing system, configured to: obtain absolute capacitance measurements via the first set of electrodes; obtain at least one transcapacitance measurement via at least one receiver electrode of the second set of electrodes; determine the fold angle of the foldable device based on the absolute capacitance measurements; and determine whether the foldable device is in an open state or a closed state based on the at least one transcapacitance measurement.

In a further exemplary embodiment, the processing system is configured to obtain the absolute capacitance measurements and the at least one transcapacitance measurement in a single sensing step.

In a further exemplary embodiment, the processing system is configured to, in the single sensing step, ground one or more electrodes disposed between the first and second sets of electrodes and guard one or more electrodes disposed between the first and second sets of electrodes.

In a further exemplary embodiment, the processing system is configured to obtain the absolute capacitance measurements in a first sensing step and the at least one transcapacitance measurement in a second sensing step different from the first sensing step.

In a further exemplary embodiment, the processing system is configured to, in the second sensing step, ground a plurality of electrodes disposed between a first electrode of the second set of electrodes and a second electrode of the second set of electrodes, wherein the first and second electrodes of the second set of electrodes are on opposite sides of the fold line of the foldable device.

In a further exemplary embodiment, the second set of electrodes comprises electrodes proximate to top and bottom edges of the foldable device.

In a further exemplary embodiment, the second set of electrodes does not include a topmost electrode proximate to a top edge of the foldable device.

In a further exemplary embodiment, the second set of electrodes comprises a plurality of receiver electrodes; and the processing system is configured to utilize resulting signals from the plurality of receiver electrodes to cancel out noise common to the plurality of receiver electrodes.

In a further exemplary embodiment, the second set of electrodes comprises a plurality of transmitter electrodes, and the processing system is configured to drive at least one electrode of the plurality of transmitter electrodes with at least one sensing signal having a first phase and at least one other electrode of the plurality of transmitter electrodes with at least one sensing signal having a second phase opposite of the first phase.

In a further exemplary embodiment, the processing system is further configured to: obtain touch sensing measurements via the first and second sets of electrodes; and determine, based on the touch sensing measurements, a position of an input object in a sensing region corresponding to the plurality of electrodes.

In yet another exemplary embodiment, the present disclosure provides a method for determining a fold angle and an open or closed state of a foldable device. The method includes: obtaining, by a processing system, absolute capacitance measurements via a first set of electrodes of a plurality of electrodes of the foldable device; obtaining, by the processing system, at least one transcapacitance measurement via at least one receiver electrode of a second set of electrodes of the plurality of electrodes of the foldable device, wherein each of the second set of electrodes is farther from a fold line of the foldable device than each of the first set of electrodes; determining, by the processing system, the fold angle of the foldable device based on the absolute capacitance measurements; and determining, by the processing system, whether the foldable device is in an open state or a closed state based on the at least one transcapacitance measurement.

In a further exemplary embodiment, determining whether the foldable device is in the open state or in the closed state comprises: in response to determining that the fold angle of the foldable device is 0° or below a predetermined value, confirming that the foldable device is in the closed state based on the at least one transcapacitance measurement.

In a further exemplary embodiment, determining the fold angle of the foldable device is in response to determining that the foldable device is in the open state based on the at least one transcapacitance measurement.

In yet another exemplary embodiment, the present disclosure provides a non-transitory computer-readable medium having processor-executable instructions stored thereon for determining a fold angle and an open or closed state of a foldable device. The processor-executable instructions, when executed, facilitating performance of the following: obtaining, by a processing system, absolute capacitance measurements via a first set of electrodes of a plurality of electrodes of the foldable device; obtaining, by the processing system, at least one transcapacitance measurement via at least one receiver electrode of a second set of electrodes of the plurality of electrodes of the foldable device, wherein each of the second set of electrodes is farther from a fold line of the foldable device than each of the first set of electrodes; determining, by the processing system, the fold angle of the foldable device based on the absolute capacitance measurements; and determining, by the processing system, whether the foldable device is in an open state or a closed state based on the at least one transcapacitance measurement.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

FIG. 1 is a block diagram depicting an example input device.

FIGS. 2A-2B are block diagrams depicting further examples of input devices.

FIGS. 3A-3B are block diagrams depicting examples of foldable devices in accordance with exemplary embodiments of the present disclosure.

FIGS. 4A-4B depict examples of capacitive sensor arrays for exemplary foldable devices in accordance with exemplary embodiments of the present disclosure.

FIG. 5 is a flowchart of an exemplary process for capacitively determining a fold angle of a foldable device in accordance with exemplary embodiments of the present disclosure.

FIGS. 6A-6B depict examples of a foldable device in an open flat state and a folded forwards state to illustrate working principles of exemplary embodiments of the present application.

FIG. 7 depicts an example of a manner of operating a capacitive sensor array in accordance with an exemplary embodiment of the present disclosure.

FIG. 8 depicts an example of a manner of operating a capacitive sensor array in accordance with another exemplary embodiment of the present disclosure.

FIG. 9 depicts an example of a manner of operating a capacitive sensor array in accordance with yet another exemplary embodiment of the present disclosure.

FIG. 10A depicts an example of a manner of operating a capacitive sensor array in accordance with an exemplary embodiment of the present disclosure in which transcapacitive sensing is performed using electrodes of the capacitive sensor array to determine whether or not the foldable device is in the closed state.

FIG. 10B depicts locations of the TX and RX electrodes of FIG. 10A when the foldable device is in the closed state.

FIG. 11 depicts an example of a manner of operating a capacitive sensor array in accordance with an exemplary embodiment of the present disclosure in which transcapacitive sensing and absolute capacitance sensing are performed together in a single sensing step.

FIGS. 12A-12C are flowcharts of exemplary processes for capacitively determining a fold angle and/or an open/closed state of a foldable device in accordance with exemplary embodiments of the present disclosure.

FIG. 13A depicts another example of a manner of operating a capacitive sensor array in accordance with an exemplary embodiment of the present disclosure in which transcapacitive sensing is performed using electrodes of the capacitive sensor array to determine whether or not the foldable device is in the closed state.

FIG. 13B depicts locations of the TX and RX electrodes of FIG. 13A when the foldable device is in the closed state.

FIG. 14A depicts yet another example of a manner of operating a capacitive sensor array in accordance with an exemplary embodiment of the present disclosure in which transcapacitive sensing is performed using electrodes of the capacitive sensor array to determine whether or not the foldable device is in the closed state.

FIG. 14B depicts locations of the TX and RX electrodes of FIG. 14A when the foldable device is in the closed state.

FIGS. 15-17 depict locations of TX and RX electrodes for foldable devices in the closed state in accordance with additional other exemplary manners of operating a capacitive sensor array in accordance with exemplary embodiments of the present disclosure in which transcapacitive sensing is performed using electrodes of the capacitive sensor array to determine whether or not the foldable device is in the closed state.

FIGS. 18A-18B depict an example shape of RX and TX electrodes, respectively.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION

The following detailed description is exemplary in nature and is not intended to limit the disclosure or the application and uses of the disclosure. Furthermore, there is no intention to be bound by any expressed or implied theory presented in the preceding background, summary and brief description of the drawings, or the following detailed description.

Exemplary devices and methods discussed herein provide for detecting a fold angle for foldable devices such as a foldable mobile device. The foldable device may include a capacitive sensor (such as a touchscreen display) that spans across a fold line (also referred to as a hinge) in the device, or the foldable device may include multiple capacitive sensors with at least one capacitive sensor on each side of a fold line in the foldable device. According to exemplary embodiments of the present disclosure, the foldable device may use the capacitive sensor(s) to detect a fold angle (wherein detection of the fold angle may include detecting whether the foldable device is open or closed), while avoiding accuracy problems due to temperature change and display noise, and without the use of temporal filters. Thus, exemplary embodiments of the present disclosure are able to achieve accurate and timely fold angle detection for a foldable device while eliminating the need for an open/closed sensor such as an IR sensor or a Hall sensor and further eliminating the need for a set of gyroscopic sensors and/or accelerometers for determining the fold angle.

It will therefore be appreciated that, by using capacitive sensor(s) of a foldable device to detect a fold angle of the foldable device, exemplary embodiments of the present disclosure achieve various advantages relative to conventional foldable devices-including, but not limited to, reduction in bill of material (BOM) costs, assembly labor, simplification of product design, avoidance of interference to the display caused by magnetic switch, improved reliability (a statistical side effect of fewer parts), etc.

For reference in the present application, a fold angle of 0° is referred to as the foldable device being closed, a fold angle of 180° is referred to as the foldable device being open flat, a fold angle of between 0° and 180° is referred to as the foldable device being folded forward. Further, for foldable devices which are able to be folded backwards in addition to being folded forwards, a fold angle of 360° is referred to as the foldable device being fully folded backwards, and a fold angle of between 180° and 360° is referred to as the foldable device being folded backwards.

FIG. 1 is a block diagram depicting an example input device to illustrate the working principles of a capacitive sensor. The input device 100 may be configured to provide input to an electronic system. As used herein, the term “electronic system” (or “electronic device”) broadly refers to any system capable of electronically processing information. Some non-limiting examples of electronic systems include personal computers of all sizes and shapes, such as desktop computers, laptop computers, netbook computers, tablets, web browsers, e-book readers, personal digital assistants (PDAs), and wearable computers (such as smart watches and activity tracker devices). Additional examples of electronic systems include composite input devices, such as physical keyboards that include input device 100 and separate joysticks or key switches. Further examples of electronic systems include peripherals such as data input devices (including remote controls and mice), and data output devices (including display screens and printers). Other examples include remote terminals, kiosks, and video game machines (e.g., video game consoles, portable gaming devices, and the like). Other examples include communication devices (including cellular phones, such as smart phones), and media devices (including recorders, editors, and players such as televisions, set-top boxes, music players, digital photo frames, and digital cameras). Additionally, the electronic system may be a host or a slave to the input device.

The input device 100 may be implemented as a physical part of the electronic system, or can be physically separate from the electronic system. As appropriate, the input device 100 may communicate with parts of the electronic system using any one or more of the following: buses, networks, and other wired or wireless interconnections. Examples include Inter-Integrated Circuit (I2C), Serial Peripheral Interface (SPI), Personal System/2 (PS/2), Universal Serial Bus (USB), Bluetooth, radio frequency (RF), and Infrared Data Association (IRDA).

In FIG. 1 , a sensor 105 is included with the input device 100. The sensor 105 comprises one or more sensing elements configured to sense input provided by one or more input objects in a sensing region. Examples of input objects include fingers, styli, and hands. The sensing region encompasses any space above, around, in and/or near the sensor 105 in which the input device 100 is able to detect user input (e.g., user input provided by one or more input objects). The sizes, shapes, and locations of particular sensing regions may vary from embodiment to embodiment. In some embodiments, the sensing region extends from a surface of the input device 100 in one or more directions into space until signal-to-noise ratios prevent sufficiently accurate object detection. The distance to which this sensing region extends in a particular direction, in various embodiments, may be on the order of less than a millimeter, millimeters, centimeters, or more, and may vary significantly with the type of sensing technology used and the accuracy desired. Thus, some embodiments sense input that comprises no contact with any surfaces of the input device 100, contact with an input surface (e.g., a touch surface) of the input device 100, contact with an input surface of the input device 100 coupled with some amount of applied force or pressure, and/or a combination thereof. In various embodiments, input surfaces may be provided by surfaces of sensor substrates within which or on which sensor elements are positioned, or by face sheets or other cover layers positioned over sensor elements.

The input device 100 comprises one or more sensing elements for detecting user input. Some implementations utilize arrays or other regular or irregular patterns of sensing elements to detect the input object. The input device 100 may utilize different combinations of sensor components and sensing technologies to detect user input in the sensing region.

The input device 100 is a capacitance (e.g., transcapacitive or absolute capacitance (“abs-cap”)) input device, wherein voltage or current is applied to create an electric field. Nearby input objects cause changes in the electric field, and produce detectable changes in capacitive coupling that may be detected as changes in voltage, current, or the like.

The input device utilizes arrays or other regular or irregular patterns of capacitive sensing elements to create electric fields. In some instances, separate sensing elements may be ohmically shorted together to form larger sensor electrodes. Some other instances may utilize resistive sheets, which may be uniformly resistive.

The input device may utilize “self capacitance” (or “absolute capacitance”) sensing methods based on changes in the capacitive coupling between sensor electrodes and an input object. In various embodiments, an input object near the sensor electrodes alters the electric field near the sensor electrodes, thus changing the measured capacitive coupling. In one implementation, an absolute capacitance sensing method operates by modulating sensor electrodes with respect to a reference voltage (e.g., system ground), and by detecting the capacitive coupling between the sensor electrodes and input objects. The reference voltage may by a substantially constant voltage or a varying voltage and in various embodiments; the reference voltage may be system ground. Measurements acquired using absolute capacitance sensing methods may be referred to as absolute capacitive (“abs-cap”) measurements.

The input device may utilize “mutual capacitance” (or “transcapacitance”) sensing methods based on changes in the capacitive coupling between sensor electrodes. In various embodiments, an input object near the sensor electrodes alters the electric field between the sensor electrodes, thus changing the measured capacitive coupling. In one implementation, a transcapacitive sensing method operates by detecting the capacitive coupling between one or more transmitter sensor electrodes (also “transmitter electrodes” or “drive electrodes”) and one or more receiver sensor electrodes (also “receiver electrodes” or “pickup electrodes”). Transmitter sensor electrodes may be modulated relative to a reference voltage to transmit transmitter signals. Receiver sensor electrodes may be held substantially constant relative to the reference voltage to facilitate receipt of resulting signals. The reference voltage may be, for example, a substantially constant voltage or system ground. In some embodiments, transmitter sensor electrodes and receiver sensor electrodes may both be modulated. The transmitter electrodes are modulated relative to the receiver electrodes to transmit transmitter signals and to facilitate receipt of resulting signals. A resulting signal may comprise effect(s) corresponding to one or more transmitter signals, and/or to one or more sources of environmental interference (e.g. other electromagnetic signals). Sensor electrodes may be dedicated transmitters or receivers, or may be configured to both transmit and receive.

Some implementations of the input device 100 are configured to provide images that span one, two, three, or higher dimensional spaces. The input device 100 may have a sensor resolution that varies from embodiment to embodiment depending on factors such as the particular sensing technology involved and/or the scale of information of interest. In some embodiments, the sensor resolution is determined by the physical arrangement of an array of sensing elements, where smaller sensing elements and/or a smaller pitch can be used to define a higher sensor resolution.

The input device 100 may be implemented, for example, as a capacitive touch sensor having a relatively lower resolution, or as a capacitive fingerprint sensor having a relatively higher sensor resolution high enough to capture discriminative features of a fingerprint. In some implementations, the fingerprint sensor has a resolution sufficient to capture minutia (including ridge endings and bifurcations), orientation fields (sometimes referred to as “ridge flows”), and/or ridge skeletons. These are sometimes referred to as level 1 and level 2 features, and in an exemplary embodiment, a resolution of at least 250 pixels per inch (ppi) is capable of reliably capturing these features. In some implementations, the fingerprint sensor has a resolution sufficient to capture higher level features, such as sweat pores or edge contours (i.e., shapes of the edges of individual ridges). These are sometimes referred to as level 3 features, and in an exemplary embodiment, a resolution of at least 750 pixels per inch (ppi) is capable of reliably capturing these higher level features.

In some embodiments, a fingerprint sensor is implemented as a placement sensor (also “area” sensor or “static” sensor) or a swipe sensor (also “slide” sensor or “sweep” sensor). In a placement sensor implementation, the sensor is configured to capture a fingerprint input as the user's finger is held stationary over the sensing region. Typically, the placement sensor includes a two dimensional array of sensing elements capable of capturing a desired area of the fingerprint in a single frame. In a swipe sensor implementation, the sensor is configured to capture to a fingerprint input based on relative movement between the user's finger and the sensing region. Typically, the swipe sensor includes a linear array or a thin two-dimensional array of sensing elements configured to capture multiple frames as the user's finger is swiped over the sensing region. The multiple frames may then be reconstructed to form an image of the fingerprint corresponding to the fingerprint input. In some implementations, the sensor is configured to capture both placement and swipe inputs.

In some embodiments, a fingerprint sensor is configured to capture less than a full area of a user's fingerprint in a single user input (referred to herein as a “partial” fingerprint sensor). Typically, the resulting partial area of the fingerprint captured by the partial fingerprint sensor is sufficient for the system to perform fingerprint matching from a single user input of the fingerprint (e.g., a single finger placement or a single finger swipe). Some exemplary imaging areas for partial placement sensors include an imaging area of 100 mm² or less. In another exemplary embodiment, a partial placement sensor has an imaging area in the range of 20-50 mm². In some implementations, the partial fingerprint sensor has an input surface that is the same size the imaging area.

In FIG. 1 , a processing system 110 is included with the input device 100. The processing system 110 comprises parts of or all of one or more integrated circuits (ICs) and/or other circuitry components. The processing system 110 is coupled to the sensor 105, and is configured to detect input in the sensing region using sensing hardware of the sensor 105.

The processing system 110 may include driver circuitry configured to drive sensing signals with sensing hardware of the input device 100 and/or receiver circuitry configured to receive resulting signals with the sensing hardware. For example, a processing system may be configured to drive transmitter signals onto transmitter sensor electrodes of the sensor 105, and/or receive resulting signals detected via receiver sensor electrodes of the sensor 105.

The processing system 110 may include a non-transitory computer-readable medium having processor-executable instructions (such as firmware code, software code, and/or the like) stored thereon. The processing system 110 can be implemented as a physical part of the sensor 105, or can be physically separate from the sensor 105. Also, constituent components of the processing system 110 may be located together, or may be located physically separate from each other. For example, the input device 100 may be a peripheral coupled to a computing device, and the processing system 110 may comprise software configured to run on a central processing unit of the computing device and one or more ICs (e.g., with associated firmware) separate from the central processing unit. As another example, the input device 100 may be physically integrated in a mobile device, and the processing system 110 may comprise circuits and firmware that are part of a main processor of the mobile device. The processing system 110 may be dedicated to implementing the input device 100, or may perform other functions, such as operating display screens, driving haptic actuators, etc.

The processing system 110 may operate the sensing element(s) of the sensor 105 of the input device 100 to produce electrical signals indicative of input (or lack of input) in a sensing region. The processing system 110 may perform any appropriate amount of processing on the electrical signals in producing the information provided to the electronic system. For example, the processing system 110 may digitize analog electrical signals obtained from the sensor electrodes. As another example, the processing system 110 may perform filtering or other signal conditioning. As yet another example, the processing system 110 may subtract or otherwise account for a baseline, such that the information reflects a difference between the electrical signals and the baseline. As yet further examples, the processing system 110 may determine positional information, recognize inputs as commands, recognize handwriting, match biometric samples, and the like.

The sensing region of the input device 100 may overlap part or all of an active area of a display device, for example, if the sensor 105 provides a touch screen interface. The display device may be any suitable type of dynamic display capable of displaying a visual interface to a user, including an inorganic light-emitting diode (LED) display, organic LED (OLED) display, cathode ray tube (CRT), liquid crystal display (LCD), plasma display, electroluminescence (EL) display, or other display technology. The display may be flexible or rigid, and may be flat, curved, or have other geometries. The display may include a glass or plastic substrate for thin-film transistor (TFT) circuitry, which may be used to address display pixels for providing visual information and/or providing other functionality. The display device may include a cover lens (sometimes referred to as a “cover glass”) disposed above display circuitry and above inner layers of the display module, and the cover lens may also provide an input surface for the input device 100. Examples of cover lens materials include optically clear amorphous solids, such as chemically hardened glass, and optically clear crystalline structures, such as sapphire. The input device 100 and the display device may share physical elements. For example, some of the same electrical components may be utilized for both displaying visual information and for input sensing with the input device 100, such as using one or more display electrodes for both display updating and input sensing. As another example, the display screen may be operated in part or in total by the processing system 110 in communication with the input device.

FIGS. 2A-2B are block diagrams depicting further examples of input devices to illustrate the working principles of capacitive sensors. In FIG. 2A, the input device 100 is shown as including a touch sensor 205 a. The touch sensor 205 a is configured to detect position information of an input object 240 a within the sensing region 220 a. The input object 240 a may include a finger or a stylus, as shown in FIG. 2A. The sensing region 220 a may include an input surface having a larger area than the input object. The touch sensor 205 a may include an array of sensing elements with a resolution configured to detect a location of a touch to the input surface.

In FIG. 2B, the input device 100 is shown as including a fingerprint sensor 205 b. The fingerprint sensor 205 b is configured to capture a fingerprint from a finger 240 b. The fingerprint sensor 205 b is disposed underneath a cover layer 212 that provides an input surface for the fingerprint to be placed on or swiped over the fingerprint sensor 205 b. The sensing region 220 b may include an input surface with an area larger than, smaller than, or similar in size to a full fingerprint. The fingerprint sensor 205 b has an array of sensing elements with a resolution configured to detect surface variations of the finger 240 b, and the fingerprint sensor 205 b has a higher resolution than the touch sensor 205 a of FIG. 2A.

FIGS. 3A-3B are block diagrams depicting examples of foldable devices in accordance with exemplary embodiments of the present disclosure. In FIG. 3A, foldable device 300 a has a single capacitive sensor array 310 which spans both sides of fold line 301. Capacitive sensor array 310 may be, for example, part of a foldable touchscreen display which is part of a foldable mobile device. In FIG. 3B, foldable device 300 b has multiple capacitive sensor arrays, including a first capacitive sensor array 311 on one side of fold line 301 and a second capacitive sensor array 312 on the other side of fold line 301. In one exemplary implementation, both the first and second capacitive sensor arrays 311, 312 are controlled by a single touch controller, and in another exemplary implementation, the first and second capacitive sensor arrays 311, 312 are controlled by separate touch controllers. In one exemplary implementation, both the first and second capacitive sensor arrays 311, 312 are part of respective touchscreens, and in other exemplary implementations, the first and second capacitive sensor arrays 311, 312 may be parts of different input devices (e.g., one may be a touchscreen display while the other is a touchpad or fingerprint sensor).

It will be appreciated that the foldable device depicted in FIGS. 3A-3B are merely exemplary, and that exemplary embodiments of the foldable device may be implemented with other types of foldable devices as well. For example, the principles discussed herein are also applicable to foldable devices with more than one fold line and/or more than two capacitive sensor arrays.

FIGS. 4A-4B depict examples of capacitive sensor arrays for exemplary foldable devices in accordance with exemplary embodiments of the present disclosure. In FIG. 4A, foldable device 400 a includes a multi-layer metal mesh (MM) array of rectangular sensor electrodes in a bars-and-stripes pattern which spans across fold line 401. Thus, sensor electrodes depicted in FIG. 4A correspond to an exemplary implementation of the capacitive sensor array 310 of FIG. 3A. In this example, to operate the sensor electrodes for touch sensing, the horizontal electrodes 402 may be operated as receiver (Rx) electrodes and the vertical electrodes 404 may be operated as transmitter (Tx) electrodes, such that based on driving the Tx electrodes with sensing signals, resulting signals are obtained via the Rx electrodes which provide capacitive touch sensing information for each intersection between respective Tx and Rx electrodes. It will be appreciated that electrodes depicted in FIG. 4A may also be operated in an absolute capacitance manner (for example, as discussed below with regard to detecting a fold angle).

In FIG. 4B, foldable device 400 b includes a single-layer metal mesh (MM) array of sensor electrodes in the form of sensing pads 412. The sensing pads 412 are disposed on both sides of fold line 401. In one implementation, the sensing pads 412 are all part of a single capacitive sensor array (see capacitive sensor array 310 of FIG. 3A), and in another implementation, the sensing pads 412 above the fold line 401 are part of a first capacitive sensor array and the sensing pads 412 below the fold line 401 are part of a second capacitive sensor array (see first and second capacitive sensor arrays 311, 312 of FIG. 3B). For abs-cap sensing using the sensing pads 412, each respective sensing pad 412 is driven and a resulting signal is obtained therefrom, thereby providing capacitive touch sensing information for each sensing pad location.

FIG. 5 is a flowchart of an exemplary process for capacitively determining a fold angle of a foldable device in accordance with exemplary embodiments of the present disclosure. At stage 502, a subset of sensor electrodes of a foldable device are driven, and absolute capacitance measurements are obtained from that subset of sensor electrodes. Other sensor electrodes of the foldable device may be grounded and/or guarded. In accordance with exemplary embodiments of the present disclosure, the absolute capacitance measurements obtained from a subset of sensor electrodes under measurement include at least one absolute capacitance measurement obtained from at least one sensor electrode whose dimensions are changed by bending at the fold line of the foldable device (referred to herein as at least one “first” sensor electrode) and at least one sensor electrode whose dimensions are unchanged (or minimally changed) by the bending of the foldable device (referred to herein as at least one “second” sensor electrode, which is farther from a fold line of the foldable device than the at least one first sensor electrode). It is advantageous, but not necessarily required, for the at least one first sensor electrode and the at least one second sensor electrode to be proximate to one another such that common effects (such as due to temperature or display noise) affect the electrodes in a relatively similar manner. As will be explained below, the measurement(s) from the at least one “first” sensor electrode contain the relevant signal from which the fold angle can be determined, and the measurement(s) from the at least one “second” sensor electrode are used to cancel out or remove interference caused by common factors such as temperature drift and display noise.

In an exemplary embodiment (as depicted and discussed in further detail below in connection with FIG. 7 ), the absolute capacitance measurements obtained from the subset of sensor electrodes under measurement include two absolute capacitance measurements from two sensor electrodes whose dimensions are changed by bending at the fold line of the foldable device, wherein these two sensor electrodes (B and C) are on opposing sides of the fold line, as well as two absolute capacitance measurements from two sensor electrodes whose dimensions are unchanged (or minimally changed) by bending at the fold line of the foldable device, wherein these two sensor electrodes (A and D) are also on opposing sides of the fold line.

In another exemplary embodiment (as depicted and discussed in further detail below in connection with FIG. 9 ), the absolute capacitance measurements obtained from a subset of sensor electrodes under measurement include one absolute capacitance measurement from one sensor electrode whose dimensions are changed by bending at the fold line of the foldable device and one absolute capacitance measurement from one sensor electrode whose dimensions are unchanged (or minimally changed) by bending at the fold line of the foldable device, wherein the two sensor electrodes (e.g., A and B) are on the same side of the fold line.

In yet another exemplary embodiment (as depicted and discussed in further detail below in connection with FIG. 8 ), the absolute capacitance measurements obtained from a subset of sensor electrodes under measurement include one absolute capacitance measurement from one sensor electrode (e.g., H) disposed at the fold line and whose dimensions are changed by bending at the fold line of the foldable device, as well as two absolute capacitance measurement from two sensor electrodes whose dimensions are unchanged (or minimally changed) by bending at the fold line of the foldable device, wherein the two sensor electrodes (e.g., A and D) are on opposing sides of the fold line.

At stage 504, based on the absolute capacitance measurements obtained from the subset of sensor electrodes at stage 502, a processing system of the foldable device determines a fold angle of the foldable device. As will be explained in further detail below, this determination takes into account reference absolute capacitance measurements taken at a known fold angle (e.g., based on calibrations performed in production and/or in runtime), such that the processing system is able to take the absolute capacitance measurements from stage 502 and determine a fold angle therefrom.

At stage 506, the processing system (or another processor of the foldable device) executes one or more operations based on the determined fold angle. For example, the content displayed on a foldable device may be based on the fold angle of the foldable device. In one implementation, if the device is only partially open (such as around ½ open or ¼ open), only the bottom portion of the display (e.g., below the fold line) is turned on and used to display notifications, reminders, time, battery life, and/or other information, while a top portion of the display (e.g., above the fold line) is off. This may further include displaying more detailed information (such as including notifications, reminders, time, and battery life) based on the foldable device being around ½ open and displaying less information (such as only including time and battery life) based on the foldable device being around ¼ open. In another example, based on a foldable device being open at a fold angle at or around 90 degrees (half-open), the top half display of the foldable device may show a video or live camera feed, while the bottom half display of the foldable device provides user interface control elements (e.g., displays touchscreen controls, such as for pause, play fast forward, rewind, video editing, camera shutter, etc.). The top half display may further be provided at a relatively faster display update rate, while the bottom half display is provided at a relatively slower display update rate. In yet another example, based on a foldable device being open at a fold angle at or around 360 degrees (fully folded backwards), certain applications may use the two sides of the foldable device for different functions (e.g., a “stud finder” application may use one side of the foldable device for detecting studs under drywall and the other side of the foldable device for displaying the location of the stud).

FIGS. 6A-6B depict examples of a foldable device in an open flat state (FIG. 6A) and a folded forwards state (FIG. 6B) to illustrate working principles of exemplary embodiments of the present application. In FIG. 6A, when the foldable device is open flat with no bending, a respective portion of a sensor metal mesh (MM) layer 601 has a length of L₀. When the foldable device is then bent forwards by an angle of α° as shown in FIG. 6B, the length of the respective portion of the sensor MM layer changes to a length of L₁. Further, a neutral layer 603 of the foldable device is shown in FIGS. 6A-6B. The neutral layer 603 of the foldable device maintains the same length with and without bending even at and near the fold line, and display elements of a display module of the foldable device (e.g., a thin-film transistor (TFT) backplane of the display module) which are relatively more fragile may be positioned at the neutral layer 603 to minimize squeezing and stretching of those components. When bending the foldable device forwards (i.e., from the position shown in FIG. 6A to the position shown in FIG. 6B, corresponding to positive α°), portions of the foldable device which are above the neutral layer and proximate to the fold line are squeezed (shortened), whereas portions of the foldable device which are below the neutral layer and proximate to the fold line are stretched (lengthened). When bending the foldable device backwards (corresponding to negative α°), portions of the foldable device which are above the neutral layer and proximate to the fold line are stretched (lengthened), whereas portions of the foldable device which are below the neutral layer and proximate to the fold line are squeezed (shortened). It will be appreciated that the fold angle of the foldable device, as referred to herein, corresponds to 180°−α°, such that, for example, a fold angle of 0° (closed state) corresponds to α=180; a fold angle of 90° (half-open state) corresponds to α=90; a fold angle of 180° (open flat state) corresponds to α=0; and a fold angle of 360° (fully folded backwards state) corresponds to α=−180.

In the example shown in FIGS. 6A-6B, the sensor MM layer 601 of the foldable device, as well as a cathode layer (GND) 602 of the foldable device, are above a neutral layer 603 of the foldable device. Thus, the length of the respective portion of the sensor metal mesh (MM) layer 601, which may span multiple sensor electrodes, is shortened from L₀ to L₁ when the foldable device is folded forwards from the open position shown in FIG. 6A to the folded position shown in FIG. 6B. This change in length is governed by the following equation:

L ₁-L ₀=π*δ*α°/180°

where δ is the distance between the sensor MM layer and the neutral layer (see FIG. 6A). According to the conventions for this example, δ is negative when the sensor MM layer is above the neutral layer (corresponding to L₁-L₀ being negative and L₁ being shorter than L₀), and δ would be positive if the sensor MM layer were to be below the neutral layer (corresponding to L₁-L₀ being positive and L₁ being longer than L₀).

The metal mesh width (w) and the distance between the sensor MM layer and cathode layer (d in FIG. 6A) will also change based on the bending of the foldable device, and it can be assumed that the same ratio β applies, such that changes to w and d can be canceled out. That is, the capacitance C_(b) between the cathode layer and a respective sensor electrode affected by the bending is proportional to

$\frac{{w\left( {1 - \beta} \right)}L_{1}}{d\left( {1 - \beta} \right)},$

which can be expressed as

$\frac{wL_{1}}{d}$

with the 1-β terms canceled out. It will be appreciated that the capacitance C_(b) measured by the respective sensor electrode may also be affected by the changing dimensions of insulators around the respective sensor electrode in addition to the changing dimensions of the respective sensor electrode itself, but the relationship between the change in capacitance and the amount of bending remains linearly proportional.

Additionally, the distance between the sensor MM layer and the cathode layer is typically relatively small (e.g., ˜10 μm) relative to the bending radius (e.g., which may be in the range of a few millimeters), such that a change in the capacitance C_(b)—i.e., ΔC_(b)-caused by folding for a sensor electrode whose dimensions are changed by folding can simply be considered as being proportional to π*δ*α°/180°. ΔC_(b) for a sensor electrode whose dimensions are changed by folding thus has a linear relationship relative to the bending angle. Based on measuring C_(b) and/or determining ΔC_(b), the processing system of a foldable device can determine the fold angle of the foldable device (see stage 504 of FIG. 5 ).

In one exemplary implementation, the pitch of a respective electrode is 4 mm, the capacitance C_(b) is 200 pF, and the sensor MM layer to neutral layer distance δ is ˜50 μm. This results in a ΔC_(b) per 1° bend of 200 pF/4 mm*#*−0.050 mm/180=−0.044 pF, and for a 90° bend, that would be a signal level of ˜4 pF. This provides a sufficiently high signal level for ΔC_(b) to discriminate between different fold angles.

As mentioned above, conventional foldable devices do not utilize their capacitive sensor(s) to detect a fold angle of the foldable device because of issues such as temperature sensitivity, errors attributable to changes in display image, and heavy filtering being needed. Exemplary embodiments of the present disclosure, however, are able to avoid these issues based on obtaining absolute capacitance measurements for one or more sensor electrodes affected by bending together with one or more sensor electrodes not affected (or less affected) by bending. In particular, at stage 502 of FIG. 5 , absolute capacitance measurements (C_(b)) are obtained for one or more sensor electrodes affected by bending as well as one or more sensor electrodes not affected (or less) by bending. The multiple C_(b) values are then used at stage 504 of FIG. 5 to determine a fold angle of the foldable device.

FIG. 7 depicts an example of a manner of operating a capacitive sensor array in accordance with an exemplary embodiment of the present disclosure. In this example, electrodes B and C are affected by bending, whereas the other horizontal electrodes are not affected (or less affected) by bending. In operating the capacitive sensor array shown in FIG. 7 in accordance with the process shown in FIG. 5 , at stage 502, absolute capacitance measurements are obtained from each of electrodes A, B, C and D, and these absolute capacitance measurements are compared to reference baseline measurements corresponding to a known fold angle. For example, respective ΔC_(bA), ΔC_(bB), ΔC_(bC)−ΔC_(bD) values are determined based on the differences between the obtained absolute capacitance measurements for each electrode and baseline reference measurements obtained for each electrode. The folding signal for determining a fold angle may be, for example, calculated as ΔC_(bB)+ΔC_(bC)−ΔC_(bA)−ΔC_(bD) at stage 504 (a shorthand way to refer to this ΔC_(bB)+ΔC_(bC)−ΔC_(bA)−ΔC_(bD) calculation used below is “BCAD”). Since the bending of the foldable device only affects electrodes B and C (or affects electrodes B and C to a greater extent than electrodes A and D), ΔC_(bB) and ΔC_(bC) carry the signal indicative of the fold angle, whereas ΔC_(bA) and ΔC_(bD) are used to cancel out common interference factors such as display noise and temperature drift. In a situation where there is no interference at all and electrodes A and D are not affected by the bending, ΔC_(bA) and ΔC_(bD) would both be 0, because electrodes A and D are not affected by the bending and are also not affected by any other interference.

The baseline reference measurements obtained for each of electrodes A, B, C and D may be obtained, for example, when the foldable device is at a known fold angle (e.g., fully closed or open flat), such that the ΔC_(bA), ΔC_(bB), ΔC_(bC) and ΔC_(bD) values reflect the change in fold angle relative to the known fold angle. These baseline reference measurements may be obtained, for example, during runtime of the foldable device. For example, when the foldable device is in a closed state and is being powered on, baseline reference measurements may be obtained corresponding to a known fold angle of 180° as part of a calibration operation performed during the power-on process (the foldable device may detect that it is in the closed state and thereby determine the fold angle of 0° during power-on, for example, by utilizing parallel transcapacitive sensing). To provide another example, for a foldable device which also has a Hall or IR or magnet sensor for detecting closure, baseline reference measurement may be obtained when the closure sensor detects that the foldable device is in the closed state (fold angle of 0°). It will be appreciated that baseline reference measurements for the absolute capacitance sensing-based manner of determining a fold angle may be taken or updated at various points during operation of the foldable device, and it may be advantageous to take or update such baseline reference measurements upon detection of a closed state (fold angle of 0°) using parallel transcapacitive sensing as discussed below in connection with FIGS. 10A-17 .

To get from the BCAD calculation to the fold angle, the processing system may further utilize a constant k, whereby the constant k is calibrated during production of the foldable device. Given that the relationship between a change in fold angle and a corresponding change in absolute capacitance measurements for a sensor electrode whose dimensions are changed by bending is linear, the constant k may correspond to an expected capacitance change per one degree of folding. For example, the current fold angle of the foldable device may be determined by the processing system as being θ+((ΔC_(bB)+ΔC_(bC)−ΔC_(bA)−ΔC_(bD))/k), where θ is the known fold angle corresponding to the baseline reference measurements used to determine ΔC_(bA), ΔC_(bB), ΔC_(bC) and ΔC_(bD). k may be calculated, for example, by determining a first C_(bB)+C_(bC)−C_(bA)−C_(bD) value at a first known fold angle and a second C_(bB)+C_(bC)−C_(bA)−C_(bD) value at a second known fold angle, and then dividing the difference between the first and second C_(bB)+C_(bC)−C_(bA)−C_(bD) values by the difference between the first and second known fold angles. It will be appreciated that, in an exemplary implementation using integer arithmetic instead of floating point, round-off errors may be avoided by upscaling k, in which case the stored k value may reflect the change in capacitance between the two known fold angles multiplied by an upscale factor x, in which case the current fold angle of the foldable device may be determined by the processing system as being θ+x*((ΔC_(bB)+ΔC_(bC)−ΔC_(bA)−ΔC_(bD))/k). For example, if the upscaling factor x is 180 and the known fold angle corresponding to the baseline reference measurements θ is 180°, the formula used for calculating the fold angle may be 180°+180*((ΔC_(bB)+ΔC_(bC)−ΔC_(bA)−ΔC_(bD))/k).

In certain exemplary embodiments, multiple sets of baseline reference measurements corresponding to multiple respective known fold angles may be obtained, and the processing system may, for example, determine multiple sets of ΔC_(bA), ΔC_(bB), ΔC_(bC) and ΔC_(bD) values and multiple folding signals to determine multiple calculated fold angles, with a final output fold angle being based on an average of the multiple calculated fold angles.

In an alternative exemplary embodiment, the processing system may determine the fold angle without relying on change in capacitance values. For example, during production, a foldable device may be calibrated such that C_(bB)+C_(bC)−C_(bA)−C_(bD) values are obtained for a plurality of folding states (e.g., one C_(bB)+C_(bC)−C_(bA)−C_(bD) value for every degree from 0° to 360°), and a lookup table is stored by the processing system which includes a mapping between respective C_(bB)+C_(bC)−C_(bA)−C_(bD) values and respective fold angles. In this alternative exemplary embodiment, at stage 502, a set of C_(bA), C_(bB), C_(bC) and C_(bD) measurements are obtained, and at stage 504, a C_(bB)+C_(bC)−C_(bA)−C_(bD) value is determined and mapped to a respective fold angle based on the lookup table. In this alternative exemplary embodiment, the lookup table may further be calibrated during runtime, for example, by utilizing a runtime measurement at a known angle to adjust the entry in the lookup table corresponding to that respective angle, and then applying the same adjustment to all other entries in the lookup table.

With regard to display noise, it has been demonstrated through display noise testing that the display noise for electrodes A and D (i.e., N_(DispA) and N_(DispD)) is approximately the same as the display noise for electrodes B and C (i.e., N_(DispB) and N_(DispC)). Thus, calculating the folding signal as ΔC_(bB)+ΔC_(bC)−ΔC_(bA)−ΔC_(bD) (or otherwise using a C_(bB)+C_(bC)−C_(bA)−C_(bD) calculation) provides for cancelling out display noise.

Similarly, with regard to temperature drift, since electrodes A, B, C and D are close to one another, the temperature drift for these four electrodes will track each other closely. Thus, calculating the folding signal as ΔC_(bB)+ΔC_(bC)−ΔC_(bA)−ΔC_(bD) (or otherwise using a C_(bB)+C_(bC)−C_(bA)−C_(bD) calculation) provides for cancelling out the effects of temperature drift.

Calculating the folding signal as ΔC_(bB)+ΔC_(bC)−ΔC_(bA)−ΔC_(bD) (or otherwise using a C_(bB)+C_(bC)−C_(bA)−C_(bD) calculation) further provides for cancelling out effects of Analog Display Noise Suppression (ADNS), as ADNS is applied as an offset to all four of the electrodes in the same manner. Further, exemplary embodiments of the present disclosure are immune to a low ground mass (LGM) condition, as C_(b) measurements are not affected by the grounding condition.

As shown in FIG. 7 , while obtaining the absolute capacitance measurements at stage 502, the immediate neighbors above and below the four electrodes under measurement are guarded, and all other horizontal electrodes are grounded. Additionally, all vertical electrodes are grounded. The guarding of the two electrodes bordering the portion of the sensor array under measurements may provide for the signal levels of the resulting signals obtained via electrodes A and D to be comparable to the signal levels of the resulting signals obtained via electrodes B and C (that is, without the guarding, the measurements obtained via electrodes A and D may be at a higher signal level than the measurements obtained via electrodes B and C). The grounding of most of the electrodes of the sensor array provides for significantly reduced touch-to-display coupling. That is, since only 6 row electrodes out of the entire array are being driven (two being driven with a guard signal and four being driven for measurement), display artifacts are minimized or avoided. Further, the maximum driving voltage for absolute capacitance sensing is relatively low (e.g., 2 Vpp for absolute capacitance sensing relative to 9 Vpp for transcapacitance sensing), the total touch-to-display coupling while performing fold detection is relatively small (e.g., ˜33% less than performing transcapacitive sensing with CDM row-sum of “1”). Additionally, grounding and/or guarding the row electrodes prevents input object(s) (e.g., such as finger(s)) that are disposed away from the hinge area from affecting the capacitive responses detected in the hinge area.

Further, it will be appreciated that because absolute capacitance sensing is used in connection with FIG. 7 , the fold detection can be performed in an asynchronized mode relative to operation of the display. This allows for avoiding a baseline shift issue with regard to a low-temperature polycrystalline oxide (LTPO)/hybrid-oxide and polycrystalline (HOP) panel and for avoiding a display image-dependency problem.

It will be appreciated that although FIG. 7 is depicted using foldable device 400 a from FIG. 4A, which has a bars-and-stripes sensor array pattern, exemplary embodiments of the disclosure may use different sensor array patterns. For example, the sensor MM layer of a foldable device may include sensor electrodes in a diamond pattern, a metal mesh pattern for minimizing light scatter, or other sensor electrode patterns.

It will be appreciated that although FIG. 7 is depicted using foldable device 400 a from FIG. 4A, the principles discussed herein may also be applied to the foldable device 400 b from FIG. 4B (it will be appreciated that this is also true with respect to the principles discussed in connection with FIGS. 8-17 are also applicable to foldable device 400 b). For example, absolute capacitance measurements from one or more sensing pads 412 from the row immediately above the fold line may be used to determine a ΔC_(bB) value, and absolute capacitance measurements from one or more sensing pads 412 from the row immediately below the fold line may be used to determine a ΔC_(bC) value. Similarly, one or more sensing pads 412 from the second row above the fold line may be used to determine a ΔC_(bA) value, and absolute capacitance measurements from one or more sensing pads 412 from the second row below the fold line may be used to determine a ΔC_(bD) value. Additionally, sensing pads 412 surrounding the sensing pads 412 under measurement may be guarded, and all other sensing pads 412 may be grounded.

It will be appreciated that the ΔC_(b) readings for electrodes A and D are expected to be similar, such that in an alternative embodiment, instead of a BCAD formula, the processing system may use only one of ΔC_(bA) or ΔC_(bD) to determine the fold angle. That is, at stage 504, the processing system may determine the fold angle of the foldable device based on ΔC_(bB)+ΔC_(bC)−2*ΔC_(bA) or ΔC_(bB)+ΔC_(bC)−2*ΔC_(bD).

To demonstrate the effectiveness of exemplary embodiments of the present disclosure, a working prototype was developed and two different versions of the prototype were tested-one which was operated to detect a fold angle based on a “BC” signal (ΔC_(bB)+ΔC_(bC)), and one which was operated to detect a fold angle based on a “BCAD” signal (ΔC_(bB)+ΔC_(bC)−ΔC_(bA)−ΔC_(bD)). Both the BC and BCAD implementations were slowly rotated from open position to a 90° bend and then from a 90° bend to a closed position, and both the BC and BCAD signals showed good signal levels and linearity.

With regard to a display noise test using a noisy image (Zebra H55) at a fixed open angle, the display noise was significantly reduced for the BCAD signal relative to the BC signal—i.e., the BCAD signal provided a reduction of 85% of display noise relative to the BC implementation, and the BCAD implementation thus does not require extensive filtering to reduce display noise. In practice, however, some light filtering which does not introduce undesirable latency can still be used with the BCAD implementation to further reduce display noise.

With regard to a temperature drift test using a heat gun to heat the foldable device (at a fixed angle) from −25° C. to −45° C. followed by cooling the foldable device back to −25° C., the effects of temperature drift on the detected fold angle for the BCAD implementation were significantly lower than for the BC implementation.

It will be appreciated that the BCAD example depicted and discussed above in connection with FIG. 7 is merely one exemplary implementation of the principles discussed herein, and that exemplary embodiments of the present disclosure are not limited thereto. As discussed above in connection with stage 502 of FIG. 5 , obtaining at least one absolute capacitance measurement from at least one sensor electrode whose dimensions are changed by bending at the fold line of the foldable device and at least one sensor electrode whose dimensions are unchanged (or minimally changed) by the bending of the foldable device may allow for capacitively detecting a fold angle of a foldable device in a manner that minimizes the effects of display noise, reduces errors caused by temperature drift, avoids image dependency, and minimizes touch-to-display coupling.

FIG. 8 depicts an example of a manner of operating a capacitive sensor array in accordance with another exemplary embodiment of the present disclosure. In this example, the only horizontal electrode affected by bending is electrode H, whereas the other horizontal electrodes are not affected (or minimally affected) by bending. In operating the capacitive sensor array shown in FIG. 8 in accordance with the process shown in FIG. 5 , at stage 502, absolute capacitance measurements are obtained from each of electrodes A, H and D, and respective ΔC_(bA), ΔC_(bH), and ΔC_(bD) values are determined. The folding signal for determining a fold angle is then calculated as 2*ΔC_(bH)−ΔC_(bA)−ΔC_(bD) at stage 504. Since the bending of the foldable device only affects electrode H, ΔC_(bH) carries the signal indicative of the fold angle, whereas ΔC_(bA) and ΔC_(bD) are used to cancel out common interference factors such as display noise and temperature drift.

FIG. 9 depicts an example of a manner of operating a capacitive sensor array in accordance with yet another exemplary embodiment of the present disclosure. In this example, the only horizontal electrode under measurement which is affected by bending is electrode B, and electrode A which is also under measurement is not affected (or minimally affected) by bending. In operating the capacitive sensor array shown in FIG. 9 in accordance with the process shown in FIG. 5 , at stage 502, absolute capacitance measurements are obtained from each of electrodes A and B, and respective ΔC_(bA) and ΔC_(bB) values are determined. The folding signal for determining a fold angle is then calculated as ΔC_(bB)−ΔC_(bA) at stage 504. Since the bending of the foldable device affects electrode B but not electrode A, ΔC_(bB) carries the signal indicative of the fold angle, whereas ΔC_(bA) is used to cancel out common interference factors such as display noise and temperature drift.

In view of the foregoing, it will be appreciated that exemplary embodiments of the present disclosure are able to minimize the effects of display noise, reduce errors caused by temperature drift, avoid image dependency, and minimize touch-to-display coupling so as to provide a viable and accurate manner of capacitively detecting a fold angle of a foldable device. Further, exemplary embodiments of the present disclosure achieve various advantages relative to conventional foldable devices-including, but not limited to, reduction in bill of material (BOM) costs, assembly labor, simplification of product design, avoidance of interference to the display caused by magnetic switch, improved reliability (a statistical side effect of fewer parts), etc.

It will be appreciated that the exemplary embodiments discussed above in connection with FIGS. 5-9 , which are applicable to the foldable device configurations shown in FIGS. 3A-3B and FIGS. 4A-4B, relate to utilizing absolute capacitance measurements (obtained from electrodes proximate to a hinge of a foldable device) for determining a fold angle of the foldable device. In further exemplary embodiments, transcapacitance measurements (obtained from electrodes relatively farther from the hinge of the foldable device) may be utilized in combination with the absolute capacitance measurements (either in the same sensing step as the absolute capacitance measurements or in a different sensing step) for determining whether a foldable device is in a closed state (corresponding to the fold angle being 0°) or whether it is in an open state (corresponding to the fold angle being greater than 0°). This provides for enhanced reliability with regard to detecting whether or not the foldable device is in the closed state, as well as providing a way to obtain baseline reference measurements at a known fold angle. It will be appreciated that a “sensing step” refers to a sensing increment which may include a driving waveform burst with signal integration and a sample/hold period followed by analog-to-digital conversion (ADC) processing. A single sensing step may last, for example, around 50 μs, whereas two sensing steps would take, for example, 100 μs. Using a single step (as opposed to two sensing steps) may conserve power and time and in some embodiments may be preferred, but there may also be certain use cases in which a two-step approach may be advantageous (for example, as discussed below in connection with FIGS. 12A-12C).

FIG. 10A depicts an example of a manner of operating a capacitive sensor array in accordance with an exemplary embodiment of the present disclosure in which transcapacitive sensing is performed using electrodes of the capacitive sensor array to determine whether or not the foldable device is in the closed state. As can be seen from the side view depicted in FIG. 10B, when the foldable device is in the closed position, the TX electrode (shown in FIG. 10A as being disposed on the top edge of the foldable device) is directly across from and proximate to the RX electrode (shown in FIG. 10A as being disposed on the bottom edge of the foldable device). In the closed state shown in FIG. 10B, the TX electrode and the RX electrode are relatively close together such that a sensing signal driven onto the TX electrode will be detected by a processing system via a resulting signal obtained via the RX electrode, and based on the resulting signal having an amplitude above a predetermined threshold, the processing system determines that the foldable device is in a closed state. If the foldable device is opened, even if just by a small amount such that the TX and the RX electrode become separated by more than a few millimeters of distance, then the amplitude of the resulting signal will become very small or the resulting signal will become nonexistent, in which case the processing system would determine that the foldable device is in an open state (e.g., based on the amplitude of the resulting signal being below the predetermined threshold, such as in case of a resulting signal not being detectable).

It will be appreciated that in certain foldable devices, even in the closed state, there may be a certain amount of separation between the TX and RX electrodes on the opposite sides of the device. However, this degree of separation is still sufficiently small for the RX electrode to obtain a resulting signal corresponding to a sensing signal driven onto the TX electrode while the foldable device is in the closed state.

As mentioned above, the absolute capacitance measurements for determining a fold angle of a foldable device and the transcapacitance measurements for determining whether or not the foldable device is closed may be performed in a single sensing step or in separate sensing steps. For single-step sensing, a capacitive sensor array may be operated in the manner shown in FIG. 11 . In this example, the two electrodes being used for transcapacitance sensing (TX and RX as discussed above in connection with FIGS. 10A-10B) are operated in a same sensing step as (e.g., simultaneously with) the four electrodes being used for absolute capacitance sensing (A, B, C and D as discussed above in connection with FIG. 7 ). Since there is separation between the edge (or near-edge) electrodes being used for transcapacitance sensing and the near-hinge electrodes being used for absolute capacitance sensing, there is no noticeable interference between the near-edge transcapacitance sensing and the near-hinge absolute capacitance sensing. Further, performing both steps in a single step may have the advantage of reducing power consumption and sensing time (relative to two-step sensing in which the near-edge transcapacitance sensing and the near-hinge absolute capacitance sensing are carried out in separate sensing steps).

FIGS. 12A-12C are flowcharts of exemplary processes for capacitively determining a fold angle and/or an open/closed state of a foldable device in accordance with exemplary embodiments of the present disclosure. In particular, FIG. 12A depicts an exemplary process 1200 a for capacitively determining both a fold angle and an open/closed state of a foldable device. At stage 1202, absolute capacitance measurements are obtained from near-hinge sensor electrodes (for example, as depicted and discussed above in connection with FIGS. 5-9 ) and transcapacitance measurement(s) are obtained from near-edge sensor electrode(s) (for example, as depicted and discussed above in connection with FIGS. 10A-11 and as depicted and discussed below in connection with FIGS. 13-17 ). The absolute capacitance measurements and the transcapacitance measurement(s) may be obtained in a same sensing step or in different sensing steps, and when obtained in different sensing steps, either order may be carried out (e.g., first absolute capacitance sensing followed by transcapacitance sensing or first transcapacitance sensing followed by absolute capacitance sensing).

At stage 1204, the absolute capacitance measurements are used by a processing system to determine a fold angle of the fold device (for example, as depicted and discussed above in connection with FIGS. 5-9 ), and the transcapacitance measurements are used by a processing system to determine an open/closed state of the foldable device (for example, as depicted and discussed above in connection with FIGS. 10A-11 and as depicted and discussed below in connection with FIGS. 13-17 ). At stage 1206, the processing system (or another processor of the foldable device) executes one or more operations based on the determined fold angle and/or the determined open/closed state. This may include, for example, the responsive operations discussed above in connection with stage 506 of FIG. 5 .

It will be appreciated that in both one-sensing-step and two-sensing-step implementations of the exemplary process shown in FIG. 12A, both absolute capacitance sensing and transcapacitance sensing are performed, such that both a fold angle and an open/closed state are determined based thereon, respectively. However, there may also be certain implementations in which a first sensing step (either absolute capacitance sensing or transcapacitance sensing) is first performed, followed by conditionally performing the second sensing step (the other type of sensing).

FIG. 12B depicts an exemplary process 1200 b for capacitively determining a fold angle of a foldable device followed by confirming a closed state of the foldable device in two sensing steps. At stage 1212, in a first sensing step, absolute capacitance measurements are obtained from near-hinge sensor electrodes while grounding and/or guarding other electrodes, and at stage 1214, a fold angle is determined (for example, as depicted and discussed above in connection with FIGS. 5-9 ). At stage 1216, in response to the determined fold angle being θ° or close to 0° (e.g., based on determining the fold angle to be less than a predetermined value or in a predetermined range), a second sensing step is performed to obtain transcapacitance measurements from near-edge sensor electrode(s) (for example, as depicted and discussed above in connection with FIGS. 10A-11 and as depicted an discussed below in connection with FIGS. 13-17 ), and at stage 1218, the processing system confirms whether or not the foldable device is in the closed state based on the obtained transcapacitive measurements. Responsive operation(s) may then be performed at stage 1220 (for example, as discussed above with respect to stage 506 of FIG. 5 ).

It will be appreciated that, in accordance with the example depicted in FIG. 12B, in case that the fold angle determined at stage 1214 is not close to 0°, the second sensing step involving transcapacitive sensing is not performed. That is because, in this example, this second sensing step is being used as a reliable way to confirm whether or not the foldable device is closed; in cases where the absolute capacitance sensing step indicates that the foldable device is clearly not closed, this second sensing step would not need to be performed, thereby providing time and power savings relative to performing both sensing steps.

FIG. 12C depicts an exemplary process 1200 c for capacitively determining an open/closed state of a foldable device followed by determining a fold angle of the foldable device in two sensing steps. At stage 1222, in a first sensing step, transcapacitance measurements are obtained from near-edge sensor electrode(s) while grounding other electrodes, and at stage 1224, an open/closed state of a foldable device is determined (for example, as depicted and discussed above in connection with FIGS. 10A-11 and as depicted and discussed below in connection with FIGS. 13-17 ). At stage 1226, in response to determining that the foldable device is not in the closed state (i.e., determining that the foldable device is in the open state), a second sensing step is performed to obtain absolute capacitance measurements from near-hinge sensor electrodes (for example, as depicted and discussed above in connection with FIGS. 5-9 ), and at stage 1228, the processing system determines a fold angle of the foldable device based on the obtained absolute capacitance measurements. Responsive operation(s) may then be performed at stage 1230 (for example, as discussed above with respect to stage 506 of FIG. 5 ).

It will be appreciated that, in accordance with the example depicted in FIG. 12C, in case that it is determined that the foldable device is in the closed state at stage 1224, the second sensing step involving absolute capacitance sensing is not performed. That is because in cases where the transcapacitive sensing step reliably indicates that the foldable device is closed, this second sensing step to determine a fold angle would not need to be performed, thereby providing time and power savings relative to performing both sensing steps.

FIG. 13A depicts another example of a manner of operating a capacitive sensor array in accordance with an exemplary embodiment of the present disclosure in which transcapacitive sensing is performed using electrodes of the capacitive sensor array to determine whether or not the foldable device is in the closed state. Similar to the example depicted in FIG. 10A, transmitter electrodes are driven with sensing signals, and resulting signals corresponding to the sensing signals are obtained via receiver electrodes. However, in this example, multiple transmitter electrodes (i.e., TX+ and TX− electrodes driven with sensing signals having opposite “+” and “−” phases, respectively) and multiple corresponding receiver electrodes are used. This has the advantage of cancelling out noise (such as display noise) and increasing the signal level with respect to the resulting signals obtained via the receiver electrodes. In particular, the resulting signal obtained via RX1 can be expressed as C1=Ct+N1, and the resulting signal obtained via RX2 can be expressed as C2=−Ct+N2, and the processing system determines the difference between the two signals as being C1-C2=2Ct+(N1-N2)≈2Ct, where N1 and N2 corresponding to noise (e.g., display noise) coupled to RX1 and RX2, and Ct and −Ct are the capacitance levels associated with the “+” and “−” phase sensing signals driven onto TX+ and TX−. It will be appreciated that since RX1 and RX2 are relatively close to one another, the values of N1 and N2 are likely to be very close to each other and will mostly cancel out.

Additionally, in this example, the outermost electrodes are not used for transcapacitive sensing (in some foldable device, these outermost electrodes have different shapes relative to the other electrodes to account for the edge shape of the foldable device or components on the edge of the foldable device, such as a camera). Instead, near-edge sensor electrodes which are still significantly farther from the hinge than the absolute capacitance sensor electrodes are used-in this depicted example, the sensor electrodes that are second-closest and third-closest to the edge on each side of the device are used as the transmitter and receiver electrodes. This allows for the magnitude of Ct/−Ct to be approximately the same with regard to the resulting signals obtained via RX1 and RX2 (in other words, if the transmitter electrodes TX+ and TX− have different shapes, then the “Ct” value for RX1 may have a different magnitude relative to the “−Ct” value for RX2, such that C1-C2 might not simply be two times the magnitude of a one of the Ct values).

Thus, it will be appreciated that while the examples of FIG. 13A and FIG. 10A have similar working principles with regard to transcapacitance sensing, the example of FIG. 13A may provide additional advantages with regard to increasing signal level and mitigating noise. Additionally, it will be appreciated that although FIG. 13A depicts the near-hinge sensor electrodes as all being grounded (as would be the case in a dedicated sensing step for transcapacitive sensing only), the principles discussed with respect to FIG. 13A are also applicable to the case of single-step sensing in which both absolute capacitance and transcapacitive measurements are obtained in the same sensing step (in this case, the near-hinge electrodes may be operated, for example, as depicted and discussed in connection with FIGS. 5-9 ).

FIG. 13B depicts locations of the TX and RX electrodes of FIG. 13A when the foldable device is in the closed state. As can be seen in FIG. 13B, RX1 is directly across from and corresponds to TX+, and RX2 is directly across from and corresponds to TX−.

FIG. 14A depicts yet another example of a manner of operating a capacitive sensor array in accordance with an exemplary embodiment of the present disclosure in which transcapacitive sensing is performed using electrodes of the capacitive sensor array to determine whether or not the foldable device is in the closed state. Similar to the example depicted in FIG. 10A, a transmitter electrode is driven with a sensing signal, and resulting signals are obtained via receiver electrodes. However, in this example, resulting signals are obtained via multiple receiver electrodes. Similar to the example discussed above in connection with FIG. 13A, this also allows for improved noise immunity because the processing system may add two of the resulting signals together and subtract the other two—e.g., RX2+RX3−RX1−RX4. In particular, the receiver electrode (RX2) across from the driven transmitter electrode (TX) obtains a resulting signal which includes a capacitance corresponding to the sensing signal and may further include capacitance due to noise. The noise on electrodes RX2 and RX3 is then cancelled out by the noise on electrodes RX1 and RX4 (since display noise tends to increase or decrease in a single direction such as from RX1 to RX4 or vice versa, using four electrodes to cancel out display noise as discussed in connection with FIG. 14A may provide for improved noise mitigation relative to using only two electrodes for noise mitigation). Unlike the example depicted in FIG. 13A, however, the signal level is not doubled due to only a single transmitter electrode being driven (corresponding to lower power consumption).

In an exemplary implementation the configuration shown in FIG. 14A was tested with various Zebra patterns to determine the effectiveness of the noise mitigation, and it was shown that, even in the worst case of display noise, a signal strength detected in the closed state was still clearly distinguishable from a signal strength corresponding to the open state (and it will be appreciated that using two transmitter electrodes, for example as discussed and depicted above in connection with FIG. 13A, would double the signal strength in the closed state). Additionally, it was shown that temperature variations over a wide temperature range had only negligible effects on the signal level.

FIG. 14B depicts locations of the TX and RX electrodes of FIG. 14A when the foldable device is in the closed state. As mentioned above RX2 is directly across from TX, and the resulting signal obtained via RX2 thus includes a capacitance component corresponding to the sensing signal driven onto TX.

FIGS. 15-17 depict locations of TX and RX electrodes for foldable devices in the closed state in accordance with additional other exemplary manners of operating a capacitive sensor array in accordance with exemplary embodiments of the present disclosure in which transcapacitive sensing is performed using electrodes of the capacitive sensor array to determine whether or not the foldable device is in the closed state.

FIG. 15 depicts one transmitter electrode being driven with a sensing signal and the use of two receiver electrodes (RX1, RX2). The configuration shown in FIG. 15 is similar to the configuration shown in FIG. 13B, except that only one transmitter electrode is driven. Thus, operating the sensor electrodes in the configuration shown in FIG. 15 would not provide the doubling of the signal as discussed above in connection with FIGS. 13A-13B, but it would still provide for noise cancellation in a similar manner as discussed above in connection with FIGS. 13A-13B.

FIG. 16 depicts four transmitter electrodes being driven with sensing signals having opposing phases (TX−, TX+, TX+, TX−) and the use of four receiver electrodes (RX1, RX2, RX3, RX4). Based on adding two of the resulting signals and subtracting out the other two (e.g., RX2+RX3−RX1−RX4), the signal may be quadrupled (relative to the case of driving only one transmitter electrode) while cancelling out noise in a similar manner as discussed above with respect to FIG. 14A.

FIG. 17 depicts two transmitter electrodes being driven with sensing signals having the same phase (TX+, TX+) and the use of four receiver electrodes (RX1, RX2, RX3, RX4). Based on adding two of the resulting signals and subtracting out the other two (e.g., RX2+RX3−RX1−RX4), the signal may be doubled (relative to the case of driving only one transmitter electrode) while cancelling out noise in a similar manner as discussed above with respect to FIG. 14A.

It will be appreciated that the TX/RX electrode configurations shown in FIGS. 10A-11 and 13A-17 are merely exemplary, and that other combinations of TX and RX electrodes may be used for detecting an open or closed state of a foldable device without departing from the principles discussed above in connection with FIGS. 10A-17 . For example, additional TX or RX electrodes may be used, or the TX or RX electrodes may be disposed in different locations from those depicted while still providing for enhanced signal level and/or noise cancellation. Additionally, although the foregoing examples depict the TX electrodes as being on the top half of the foldable device (above the hinge) and the RX electrodes as being on the bottom half of the foldable device (below the hinge), it will be appreciated that the RX electrodes may be disposed on the top half of the foldable device and the TX electrodes may be disposed on the bottom half of the foldable device.

Additionally, it will be appreciated that although the depicted examples show bars-and-stripes electrode configurations for simplicity, in practice, a plurality of different type of electrode shapes and configurations may be used. A person of ordinary skill in the art would understand that many different types of special electrode shapes (e.g., designed to be optimized for specific respective devices) behave in a manner analogous to bars-and-stripes electrodes, and the principles discussed herein are applicable to all such variations of electrode shapes and configurations. For example, FIG. 18A depicts an example shape for 6 RX electrodes, and FIG. 18B depicts an example shape for 3 TX electrodes (which may be disposed beneath the 6 RX electrodes of FIG. 18A), and these electrodes depicted in FIGS. 18A-18B conceptually behave in a manner analogous to bars-and-stripes electrodes such that the principles discussed herein are applicable thereto. Further, as discussed above, the principles discussed herein may also be applied to an electrode configuration having a plurality of sensing pads as shown in FIG. 4B (e.g., sensing pads proximate to the edges of a foldable device may be connected together and operated in a transcapacitive manner as discussed in connection with FIGS. 10A-17 , while sensing pads proximate to the hinge of the foldable device may be connected together and operated in an absolute capacitance manner as discussed in connection with FIGS. 5-9 ).

Additionally, it will be appreciated that sensing electrodes utilized in embodiments of the present disclosure (such as the sensing electrodes depicted in FIGS. 4A-4B and FIGS. 18A-18B), whether configured in a bars-and-stripes configuration or other configuration, may be solid conductors, mesh conductors, a mix of solid and mesh, or may involve other metal patterns. For example, for an OLED on-cell sensor, the sensing electrodes may be metal mesh to provide openings for LED light to pass through.

It will further be appreciated that, in the exemplary embodiments discussed herein, the sensor electrodes utilized for obtaining absolute capacitance measurements for fold angle detection and the sensor electrodes utilized for obtaining transcapacitive measurements for open/closed detection are advantageously sensor electrodes of a plurality of touch sensing sensor electrodes of the foldable device which are also used for performing touch sensing (i.e., a processing system of the foldable device, during touch sensing operation, obtains touch sensing measurements via the touch sensing sensor electrodes and determines a position of an input object in a sensing region corresponding to the plurality of electrodes).

All references, including publications, patent applications, and patents, cited herein are hereby incorporated by reference to the same extent as if each reference were individually and specifically indicated to be incorporated by reference and were set forth in its entirety herein.

The use of the terms “a” and “an” and “the” and “at least one” and similar referents in the context of describing the invention (especially in the context of the following claims) are to be construed to cover both the singular and the plural, unless otherwise indicated herein or clearly contradicted by context. The use of the term “at least one” followed by a list of one or more items (for example, “at least one of A and B”) is to be construed to mean one item selected from the listed items (A or B) or any combination of two or more of the listed items (A and B), unless otherwise indicated herein or clearly contradicted by context. The terms “comprising,” “having,” “including,” and “containing” are to be construed as open-ended terms (i.e., meaning “including, but not limited to,”) unless otherwise noted. Recitation of ranges of values herein are merely intended to serve as a shorthand method of referring individually to each separate value falling within the range, unless otherwise indicated herein, and each separate value is incorporated into the specification as if it were individually recited herein. All methods described herein can be performed in any suitable order unless otherwise indicated herein or otherwise clearly contradicted by context. The use of any and all examples, or exemplary language (e.g., “such as”) provided herein, is intended merely to better illuminate the invention and does not pose a limitation on the scope of the invention unless otherwise claimed. No language in the specification should be construed as indicating any non-claimed element as essential to the practice of the invention.

Exemplary embodiments are described herein. Variations of those exemplary embodiments may become apparent to those of ordinary skill in the art upon reading the foregoing description. The inventors expect skilled artisans to employ such variations as appropriate, and the inventors intend for the invention to be practiced otherwise than as specifically described herein. Accordingly, this invention includes all modifications and equivalents of the subject matter recited in the claims appended hereto as permitted by applicable law. Moreover, any combination of the above-described elements in all possible variations thereof is encompassed by the invention unless otherwise indicated herein or otherwise clearly contradicted by context. 

1. A system for determining a fold angle and an open or closed state of a foldable device, comprising: a plurality of electrodes, including a first set of electrodes for performing absolute capacitance sensing and a second set of electrodes for performing transcapacitance sensing, wherein each of the second set of electrodes is farther from a fold line of the foldable device than each of the first set of electrodes; and a processing system, configured to: obtain absolute capacitance measurements via the first set of electrodes; obtain at least one transcapacitance measurement via at least one receiver electrode of the second set of electrodes; determine the fold angle of the foldable device based on the absolute capacitance measurements; and determine whether the foldable device is in an open state or a closed state based on the at least one transcapacitance measurement.
 2. The system according to claim 1, wherein the processing system is configured to obtain the absolute capacitance measurements and the at least one transcapacitance measurement in a single sensing step.
 3. The system according to claim 2, wherein the processing system is configured to, in the single sensing step, ground one or more electrodes disposed between the first and second sets of electrodes and guard one or more electrodes disposed between the first and second sets of electrodes.
 4. The system according to claim 1, wherein the processing system is configured to obtain the absolute capacitance measurements in a first sensing step and the at least one transcapacitance measurement in a second sensing step different from the first sensing step.
 5. The system according to claim 4, wherein the processing system is configured to, in the second sensing step, ground a plurality of electrodes disposed between a first electrode of the second set of electrodes and a second electrode of the second set of electrodes, wherein the first and second electrodes of the second set of electrodes are on opposite sides of the fold line of the foldable device.
 6. The system according to claim 1, wherein the second set of electrodes comprises electrodes proximate to top and bottom edges of the foldable device.
 7. The system according to claim 6, wherein the second set of electrodes does not include a topmost electrode proximate to a top edge of the foldable device.
 8. The system according to claim 1, wherein the second set of electrodes comprises a plurality of receiver electrodes; and wherein the processing system is configured to utilize resulting signals from the plurality of receiver electrodes to cancel out noise common to the plurality of receiver electrodes.
 9. The system according to claim 1, wherein the second set of electrodes comprises a plurality of transmitter electrodes, wherein the processing system is configured to drive at least one electrode of the plurality of transmitter electrodes with at least one sensing signal having a first phase and at least one other electrode of the plurality of transmitter electrodes with at least one sensing signal having a second phase opposite of the first phase.
 10. The system according to claim 1, wherein the processing system is further configured to: obtain touch sensing measurements via the first and second sets of electrodes; and determine, based on the touch sensing measurements, a position of an input object in a sensing region corresponding to the plurality of electrodes.
 11. A method for determining a fold angle and an open or closed state of a foldable device, comprising: obtaining, by a processing system, absolute capacitance measurements via a first set of electrodes of a plurality of electrodes of the foldable device; obtaining, by the processing system, at least one transcapacitance measurement via at least one receiver electrode of a second set of electrodes of the plurality of electrodes of the foldable device, wherein each of the second set of electrodes is farther from a fold line of the foldable device than each of the first set of electrodes; determining, by the processing system, the fold angle of the foldable device based on the absolute capacitance measurements; and determining, by the processing system, whether the foldable device is in an open state or a closed state based on the at least one transcapacitance measurement.
 12. The method according to claim 11, wherein determining whether the foldable device is in the open state or in the closed state comprises: in response to determining that the fold angle of the foldable device is 0° or below a predetermined value, confirming that the foldable device is in the closed state based on the at least one transcapacitance measurement.
 13. The method according to claim 11, wherein determining the fold angle of the foldable device is in response to determining that the foldable device is in the open state based on the at least one transcapacitance measurement.
 14. The method according to claim 11, wherein the absolute capacitance measurements and the at least one transcapacitance measurement are obtained in a single sensing step.
 15. The method according to claim 11, wherein the absolute capacitance measurements are obtained in a first sensing step and the at least one transcapacitance measurement are obtained in a second sensing step different from the first sensing step.
 16. The method according to claim 11, wherein the second set of electrodes comprises electrodes proximate to top and bottom edges of the foldable device.
 17. The method according to claim 11, wherein the second set of electrodes comprises a plurality of receiver electrodes; and wherein the method further comprises: utilizing resulting signals from the plurality of receiver electrodes to cancel out noise common to the plurality of receiver electrodes.
 18. The method according to claim 11, wherein the second set of electrodes comprises a plurality of transmitter electrodes, wherein at least one electrode of the plurality of transmitter electrodes is driven with at least one sensing signal having a first phase and at least one other electrode of the plurality of transmitter electrodes is driven with at least one sensing signal having a second phase opposite of the first phase.
 19. A non-transitory computer-readable medium having processor-executable instructions stored thereon for determining a fold angle and an open or closed state of a foldable device, the processor-executable instructions, when executed, facilitating performance of the following: obtaining, by a processing system, absolute capacitance measurements via a first set of electrodes of a plurality of electrodes of the foldable device; obtaining, by the processing system, at least one transcapacitance measurement via at least one receiver electrode of a second set of electrodes of the plurality of electrodes of the foldable device, wherein each of the second set of electrodes is farther from a fold line of the foldable device than each of the first set of electrodes; determining, by the processing system, the fold angle of the foldable device based on the absolute capacitance measurements; and determining, by the processing system, whether the foldable device is in an open state or a closed state based on the at least one transcapacitance measurement.
 20. The non-transitory computer-readable medium according to claim 19, wherein the second set of electrodes comprises a plurality of receiver electrodes; and wherein the processor-executable instructions, when executed, further facilitate performance of the following: utilizing resulting signals from the plurality of receiver electrodes to cancel out noise common to the plurality of receiver electrodes. 